WordPress plugin comparison
JavaScript to Footer vs JinX
At a glance
- JavaScript to Footer has more active installs: 500+, against 60+ for JinX.
- On a typical day, JavaScript to Footer is downloaded about 11 times, JinX about 2.
- JinX has no reviews yet.
- JavaScript to Footer was updated more recently: Dec 22, 2014, against Aug 18, 2010 for JinX.
- JavaScript to Footer is tested with a newer WordPress: 4.2.39, against 3.0.5 for JinX.
- JavaScript to Footer has been around longer: since 2008, against 2010 for JinX.
Line by line
JavaScript to Footer leads on 5 of 5 comparable lines.
| Metric |  JavaScript to Footer |  JinX |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #8,887 | #20,166 |
| Active installs | 500+ | 60+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 282 | 49 |
| Rating | 2.9(16) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 4.2.39 | 3.0.5 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 16 years ago |
| Requires PHP | – | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- JavaScript to Footer vs Scripts To Footer
- JavaScript to Footer vs WP Deferred JavaScripts
- JavaScript to Footer vs Header Footer Code Manager
- JavaScript to Footer vs Header and Footer Scripts
- JinX vs Specific CSS/JS for Posts and Pages
- JinX vs Asynchronous Javascript
- JinX vs Async JavaScript
- JinX vs CSS & JavaScript Toolbox
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free