WordPress plugin comparison
Asynchronous Javascript vs JinX
At a glance
- Asynchronous Javascript has more active installs: 100+, against 60+ for JinX.
- On a typical day, Asynchronous Javascript is downloaded about 8 times, JinX about 2.
- JinX has no reviews yet.
- Asynchronous Javascript was updated more recently: Nov 2, 2013, against Aug 18, 2010 for JinX.
- Asynchronous Javascript is tested with a newer WordPress: 3.5.2, against 3.0.5 for JinX.
- JinX has been around longer: since 2010, against 2013 for Asynchronous Javascript.
Line by line
Asynchronous Javascript leads on 5 of 5 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #13,675 | #20,166 |
| Active installs | 100+ | 60+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 168 | 49 |
| Rating | 3.7(9) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 3.5.2 | 3.0.5 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 13 years ago | 16 years ago |
| Requires PHP | – | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Asynchronous Javascript vs Async JavaScript
- Asynchronous Javascript vs CSS & JavaScript Toolbox
- Asynchronous Javascript vs Custom CSS and JavaScript
- Asynchronous Javascript vs WP Super Minify • Minify, Compress and Cache HTML, CSS & JavaScript
- JinX vs Specific CSS/JS for Posts and Pages
- JinX vs Async JavaScript
- JinX vs CSS & JavaScript Toolbox
- JinX vs Custom CSS and JavaScript
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free