WordPress plugin comparison
CiteHQ vs Robots.txt Editor
At a glance
- Robots.txt Editor has more active installs: 10K+, against fewer than 10 for CiteHQ.
- On a typical day, Robots.txt Editor is downloaded about 129 times, CiteHQ about 11.
- CiteHQ is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 4.5 from 8 reviews.
- CiteHQ was updated more recently: Jan 16, 2026, against Jan 16, 2021 for Robots.txt Editor.
- CiteHQ is tested with a newer WordPress: 6.9.11, against 5.6.23 for Robots.txt Editor.
- Robots.txt Editor has been around longer: since 2019, against 2026 for CiteHQ.
Line by line
CiteHQ leads on 4 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  CiteHQ |  Robots.txt Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #56,059 | #1,915 |
| Active installs | Fewer than 10 | 10K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 273 | 3.4K |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | 4.5(8) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 6.9.11 | 5.6.23 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.05 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 9 months ago | 5 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 8.0 | 5.6 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free