WordPress plugin comparison
CiteHQ vs Uncanny Automator
At a glance
- Uncanny Automator has more active installs: 40K+, against fewer than 10 for CiteHQ.
- On a typical day, Uncanny Automator is downloaded about 1,658 times, CiteHQ about 11.
- CiteHQ is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 4.9 from 157 reviews.
- Uncanny Automator was updated more recently: Nov 9, 2026, against Jan 16, 2026 for CiteHQ.
- Uncanny Automator is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 6.9.11 for CiteHQ.
- Uncanny Automator has been around longer: since 2020, against 2026 for CiteHQ.
Line by line
Uncanny Automator leads on 6 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  CiteHQ |  Uncanny Automator |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #56,059 | #843 |
| Active installs | Fewer than 10 | 40K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 273 | 82.2K |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | 4.9(157) |
| Support threads resolved | – | 100% |
| Tested up to | 6.9.11 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.05 | ×1.49 |
| Last release | 9 months ago | today |
| Requires PHP | 8.0 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free