WordPress plugin comparison
Cache Google Web Font vs WP Super Cache
At a glance
- WP Super Cache has more active installs: 1M+, against 10+ for Cache Google Web Font.
- On a typical day, WP Super Cache is downloaded about 15,287 times, Cache Google Web Font about 2.
- WP Super Cache is rated higher: 4.3 out of 5 from 1,346 reviews, against 2.0 from 2 reviews.
- WP Super Cache was updated more recently: Nov 2, 2026, against Sep 20, 2014 for Cache Google Web Font.
- WP Super Cache is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 4.0.0 for Cache Google Web Font.
- WP Super Cache has been around longer: since 2007, against 2014 for Cache Google Web Font.
Line by line
WP Super Cache leads on 7 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Cache Google Web Font |  WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #39,002 | #36 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 1M+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 40 | 905K |
| Rating | 2.0(2) | 4.3(1.3K) |
| Support threads resolved | – | 67% |
| Tested up to | 4.0.0 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×2.76 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 7 days ago |
| Requires PHP | – | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free