WordPress plugin comparison
Cache Google Web Font vs Site Kit by Google
At a glance
- Site Kit by Google has more active installs: 5M+, against 10+ for Cache Google Web Font.
- On a typical day, Site Kit by Google is downloaded about 64,452 times, Cache Google Web Font about 2.
- Site Kit by Google is rated higher: 4.2 out of 5 from 1,014 reviews, against 2.0 from 2 reviews.
- Site Kit by Google was updated more recently: Nov 2, 2026, against Sep 20, 2014 for Cache Google Web Font.
- Site Kit by Google is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 4.0.0 for Cache Google Web Font.
- Cache Google Web Font has been around longer: since 2014, against 2019 for Site Kit by Google.
Line by line
Site Kit by Google leads on 7 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #42,062 | #7 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 5M+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 38 | 5.8M |
| Rating | 2.0(2) | 4.2(1K) |
| Support threads resolved | – | 74% |
| Tested up to | 4.0.0 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×8.22 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 7 days ago |
| Requires PHP | – | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Cache Google Web Font vs OMGF
- Cache Google Web Font vs WP-Optimize
- Cache Google Web Font vs WP Fastest Cache
- Cache Google Web Font vs WP Super Cache
- Site Kit by Google vs GA Google Analytics
- Site Kit by Google vs CAOS
- Site Kit by Google vs Google Tag Manager
- Site Kit by Google vs Analytics Germanized for Google Analytics (GDPR / DSGVO)
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free