WordPress plugin comparison
Cache Google Web Font vs Local Google Fonts
At a glance
- Local Google Fonts has more active installs: 100K+, against 10+ for Cache Google Web Font.
- On a typical day, Local Google Fonts is downloaded about 856 times, Cache Google Web Font about 2.
- Local Google Fonts is rated higher: 4.6 out of 5 from 83 reviews, against 2.0 from 2 reviews.
- Local Google Fonts was updated more recently: Oct 21, 2026, against Sep 20, 2014 for Cache Google Web Font.
- Local Google Fonts is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 4.0.0 for Cache Google Web Font.
- Cache Google Web Font has been around longer: since 2014, against 2022 for Local Google Fonts.
Line by line
Local Google Fonts leads on 7 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Cache Google Web Font |  Local Google Fonts |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #42,062 | #385 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 100K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 38 | 76K |
| Rating | 2.0(2) | 4.6(83) |
| Support threads resolved | – | 0% |
| Tested up to | 4.0.0 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×1.11 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 19 days ago |
| Requires PHP | – | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Cache Google Web Font vs OMGF
- Cache Google Web Font vs Site Kit by Google
- Cache Google Web Font vs WP-Optimize
- Cache Google Web Font vs WP Fastest Cache
- Local Google Fonts vs OMGF
- Local Google Fonts vs Japanese font for WordPress(Previously
- Local Google Fonts vs Adobe Fonts (formerly Typekit) for WordPress
- Local Google Fonts vs CAOS
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free