WordPress plugin comparison
Aruba HiSpeed Cache vs Cache Google Web Font
At a glance
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has more active installs: 100K+, against 10+ for Cache Google Web Font.
- On a typical day, Aruba HiSpeed Cache is downloaded about 1,081 times, Cache Google Web Font about 2.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache is rated higher: 3.0 out of 5 from 10 reviews, against 2.0 from 2 reviews.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache was updated more recently: Oct 26, 2026, against Sep 20, 2014 for Cache Google Web Font.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 4.0.0 for Cache Google Web Font.
- Cache Google Web Font has been around longer: since 2014, against 2022 for Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
Line by line
Aruba HiSpeed Cache leads on 7 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Aruba HiSpeed Cache |  Cache Google Web Font |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #322 | #42,062 |
| Active installs | 100K+ | 10+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 45.4K | 38 |
| Rating | 3.0(10) | 2.0(2) |
| Support threads resolved | 100% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 4.0.0 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.05 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 14 days ago | 12 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free