WordPress plugin comparison
Robots.txt Editor vs Thin Content Manager
At a glance
- Robots.txt Editor has more active installs: 10K+, against 10+ for Thin Content Manager.
- On a typical day, Robots.txt Editor is downloaded about 129 times, Thin Content Manager about 1.
- Robots.txt Editor is rated higher: 4.5 out of 5 from 8 reviews, against 1.0 from 1 review.
- Robots.txt Editor was updated more recently: Jan 16, 2021, against Feb 4, 2014 for Thin Content Manager.
- Robots.txt Editor is tested with a newer WordPress: 5.6.23, against 3.7.41 for Thin Content Manager.
- Thin Content Manager has been around longer: since 2014, against 2019 for Robots.txt Editor.
Line by line
Robots.txt Editor leads on 7 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #1,915 | #47,846 |
| Active installs | 10K+ | 10+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 3.4K | 22 |
| Rating | 4.5(8) | 1.0(1) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 5.6.23 | 3.7.41 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 5 years ago | 12 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 5.6 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Robots.txt Editor vs WP Robots Txt
- Robots.txt Editor vs Virtual Robots.txt
- Robots.txt Editor vs Website LLMs.txt
- Robots.txt Editor vs Title and Nofollow For Links (Classic Editor)
- Thin Content Manager vs Virtual Robots.txt
- Thin Content Manager vs WP Robots Txt
- Thin Content Manager vs Metronet Tag Manager
- Thin Content Manager vs Google Tag Manager
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free