WordPress plugin comparison
MTM HTML to Markdown vs Server-Side Cache AutoPurge
MTM HTML to Markdown
by mtmplugins
20+ installs
Server-Side Cache AutoPurge
by suresupport
10K+ installs4.2
At a glance
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge has more active installs: 10K+, against 20+ for MTM HTML to Markdown.
- On a typical day, Server-Side Cache AutoPurge is downloaded about 40 times, MTM HTML to Markdown about 3.
- MTM HTML to Markdown has no reviews yet.
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge was updated more recently: Jun 15, 2026, against Jan 16, 2026 for MTM HTML to Markdown.
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.0.8, against 6.9.11 for MTM HTML to Markdown.
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge has been around longer: since 2020, against 2026 for MTM HTML to Markdown.
Line by line
Server-Side Cache AutoPurge leads on 6 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric | MTM HTML to Markdown | Server-Side Cache AutoPurge |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #25,499 | #1,804 |
| Active installs | 20+ | 10K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 70 | 1.2K |
| Rating | No ratings | 4.2(5) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 6.9.11 | 7.0.8 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.12 | ×0.80 |
| Last release | 9 months ago | 4 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- MTM HTML to Markdown vs LiteSpeed Cache
- MTM HTML to Markdown vs WP-Optimize
- MTM HTML to Markdown vs WP Super Cache
- MTM HTML to Markdown vs W3 Total Cache
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge vs Nginx Cache
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge vs WP-Optimize
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge vs WP Super Cache
- Server-Side Cache AutoPurge vs Breeze Cache
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free