WordPress plugin comparison
Local Google Fonts vs Magic robots.txt
At a glance
- Local Google Fonts has more active installs: 100K+, against 1K+ for Magic robots.txt.
- On a typical day, Local Google Fonts is downloaded about 856 times, Magic robots.txt about 14.
- Magic robots.txt is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 4.6 from 83 reviews.
- Local Google Fonts was updated more recently: Oct 21, 2026, against Aug 27, 2026 for Magic robots.txt.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
Line by line
Local Google Fonts leads on 5 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Local Google Fonts |  Magic robots.txt |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #385 | #6,347 |
| Active installs | 100K+ | 1K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 75.9K | 676 |
| Rating | 4.6(83) | 5.0(1) |
| Support threads resolved | 0% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.11 | ×0.63 |
| Last release | 20 days ago | 2 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Local Google Fonts vs OMGF
- Local Google Fonts vs Japanese font for WordPress(Previously
- Local Google Fonts vs Adobe Fonts (formerly Typekit) for WordPress
- Local Google Fonts vs CAOS
- Magic robots.txt vs WP Robots Txt
- Magic robots.txt vs Robots.txt Editor
- Magic robots.txt vs Virtual Robots.txt
- Magic robots.txt vs Site Kit by Google
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free