WordPress plugin comparison
Image Watermark vs WP-Auto Image Grabber
At a glance
- Image Watermark has more active installs: 40K+, against 10+ for WP-Auto Image Grabber.
- On a typical day, Image Watermark is downloaded about 364 times, WP-Auto Image Grabber about 2.
- WP-Auto Image Grabber has no reviews yet.
- Image Watermark was updated more recently: Oct 20, 2026, against Feb 28, 2011 for WP-Auto Image Grabber.
- Image Watermark is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 3.1.4 for WP-Auto Image Grabber.
- WP-Auto Image Grabber has been around longer: since 2010, against 2013 for Image Watermark.
Line by line
Image Watermark leads on 6 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Image Watermark |  WP-Auto Image Grabber |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #856 | #41,778 |
| Active installs | 40K+ | 10+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 22.9K | 40 |
| Rating | 4.2(299) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | 57% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 3.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.50 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 21 days ago | 15 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.3 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Image Watermark vs Simple Image Sizes
- Image Watermark vs Easy Watermark
- Image Watermark vs Auto Upload Images
- Image Watermark vs No Right Click Images
- WP-Auto Image Grabber vs Modern Image Formats
- WP-Auto Image Grabber vs Media Cleaner
- WP-Auto Image Grabber vs Image Placeholders
- WP-Auto Image Grabber vs Simple Image Sizes
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free