WordPress plugin comparison
Image Watermark vs jQuery Image Lazy Load WP
At a glance
- Image Watermark has more active installs: 40K+, against 700+ for jQuery Image Lazy Load WP.
- On a typical day, Image Watermark is downloaded about 364 times, jQuery Image Lazy Load WP about 12.
- Image Watermark is rated higher: 4.2 out of 5 from 299 reviews, against 3.1 from 14 reviews.
- Image Watermark was updated more recently: Oct 20, 2026, against Sep 9, 2026 for jQuery Image Lazy Load WP.
- jQuery Image Lazy Load WP has been around longer: since 2009, against 2013 for Image Watermark.
Line by line
Image Watermark leads on 6 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Image Watermark |  jQuery Image Lazy Load WP |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #856 | #7,840 |
| Active installs | 40K+ | 700+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 22.9K | 355 |
| Rating | 4.2(299) | 3.1(14) |
| Support threads resolved | 57% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | – |
| Search multiplier | ×1.50 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 21 days ago | 2 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.3 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Image Watermark vs Simple Image Sizes
- Image Watermark vs Easy Watermark
- Image Watermark vs Auto Upload Images
- Image Watermark vs No Right Click Images
- jQuery Image Lazy Load WP vs Modern Image Formats
- jQuery Image Lazy Load WP vs Media Cleaner
- jQuery Image Lazy Load WP vs Image Placeholders
- jQuery Image Lazy Load WP vs Simple Image Sizes
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free