WordPress plugin comparison
Hangul font nanumgothic vs MMUnicode Embed
At a glance
- Hangul font nanumgothic has more active installs: 900+, against 50+ for MMUnicode Embed.
- On a typical day, Hangul font nanumgothic is downloaded about 10 times, MMUnicode Embed about 2.
- MMUnicode Embed has no reviews yet.
- MMUnicode Embed was updated more recently: May 24, 2019, against Nov 5, 2014 for Hangul font nanumgothic.
- MMUnicode Embed is tested with a newer WordPress: 5.2.30, against 4.0.0 for Hangul font nanumgothic.
- MMUnicode Embed has been around longer: since 2011, against 2014 for Hangul font nanumgothic.
Line by line
Level: each leads on 3 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #6,966 | #20,460 |
| Active installs | 900+ | 50+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 173 | 54 |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 4.0.0 | 5.2.30 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 7 years ago |
| Requires PHP | – | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Hangul font nanumgothic vs Local Google Fonts
- Hangul font nanumgothic vs Admin Custom Font
- Hangul font nanumgothic vs Site Kit by Google
- Hangul font nanumgothic vs Google for WooCommerce
- MMUnicode Embed vs Myanmar Unicode Font Tagger
- MMUnicode Embed vs Unicode & Zawgyi Combobox
- MMUnicode Embed vs Shan Font
- MMUnicode Embed vs Local Google Fonts
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free