WordPress plugin comparison
EWWW Image Optimizer vs WPThumb
At a glance
- EWWW Image Optimizer has more active installs: 1M+, against 800+ for WPThumb.
- On a typical day, EWWW Image Optimizer is downloaded about 14,966 times, WPThumb about 7.
- WPThumb is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews, against 4.8 from 1,845 reviews.
- EWWW Image Optimizer was updated more recently: Oct 29, 2026, against Apr 1, 2014 for WPThumb.
- EWWW Image Optimizer is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 3.7.41 for WPThumb.
- WPThumb has been around longer: since 2011, against 2012 for EWWW Image Optimizer.
Line by line
EWWW Image Optimizer leads on 6 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #59 | #7,548 |
| Active installs | 1M+ | 800+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 961.2K | 109 |
| Rating | 4.8(1.8K) | 5.0(3) |
| Support threads resolved | 25% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 3.7.41 |
| Search multiplier | ×2.43 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 11 days ago | 12 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- EWWW Image Optimizer vs Cimo
- EWWW Image Optimizer vs ShortPixel Adaptive Images
- EWWW Image Optimizer vs Image Converter for WebP
- EWWW Image Optimizer vs Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN
- WPThumb vs Conditionally display featured image on singular posts and pages
- WPThumb vs Image Aspect Ratio Crop Field for Advanced Custom Fields
- WPThumb vs Get the Image
- WPThumb vs Manual Image Crop
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free