WordPress plugin comparison
Embed bare image links vs Image Watermark
At a glance
- Image Watermark has more active installs: 40K+, against 10+ for Embed bare image links.
- On a typical day, Image Watermark is downloaded about 364 times, Embed bare image links about 1.
- Embed bare image links is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 4.2 from 299 reviews.
- Image Watermark was updated more recently: Oct 20, 2026, against Dec 7, 2014 for Embed bare image links.
- Image Watermark is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 4.0.38 for Embed bare image links.
- Image Watermark has been around longer: since 2013, against 2014 for Embed bare image links.
Line by line
Image Watermark leads on 6 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Embed bare image links |  Image Watermark |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #47,716 | #856 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 40K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 33 | 22.9K |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | 4.2(299) |
| Support threads resolved | – | 57% |
| Tested up to | 4.0.38 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×1.50 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 21 days ago |
| Requires PHP | – | 7.3 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Embed bare image links vs Modern Image Formats
- Embed bare image links vs Page Links To
- Embed bare image links vs Media Cleaner
- Embed bare image links vs Image Placeholders
- Image Watermark vs Simple Image Sizes
- Image Watermark vs Easy Watermark
- Image Watermark vs Auto Upload Images
- Image Watermark vs No Right Click Images
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free