WordPress plugin comparison
Copyfend vs ScrapeLock
At a glance
- Copyfend has more active installs: 30+, against fewer than 10 for ScrapeLock.
- On a typical day, ScrapeLock is downloaded about 61 times, Copyfend about 4.
- ScrapeLock was updated more recently: Nov 7, 2026, against Aug 23, 2026 for Copyfend.
- ScrapeLock is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.2, against 7.1.4 for Copyfend.
Line by line
Level: each leads on 3 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Copyfend |  ScrapeLock |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #24,300 | #70,889 |
| Active installs | 30+ | Fewer than 10 |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 73 | 442 |
| Rating | No ratings | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.2 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.19 | ×0.05 |
| Last release | 2 months ago | 2 days ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Copyfend vs Gexiro Content Protection
- Copyfend vs Secure Copy Content Protection and Content Locking
- Copyfend vs Right Click Ban
- Copyfend vs Disable Right Click & Content Copy Protection
- ScrapeLock vs AI Scraping Protector
- ScrapeLock vs WindCodex ScraperBlock
- ScrapeLock vs JTZL's Bot Maze
- ScrapeLock vs Init Content Protector
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free