WordPress plugin comparison
Content Scheduler vs Simple Expires
At a glance
- Simple Expires has more active installs: 500+, against 200+ for Content Scheduler.
- On a typical day, Simple Expires is downloaded about 6 times, Content Scheduler about 5.
- Simple Expires is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 2 reviews, against 2.4 from 8 reviews.
- Content Scheduler was updated more recently: Dec 26, 2014, against Aug 8, 2011 for Simple Expires.
Line by line
Simple Expires leads on 4 of 5 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #11,578 | #8,931 |
| Active installs | 200+ | 500+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 115 | 129 |
| Rating | 2.4(8) | 5.0(2) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 4.1.0 | – |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 12 years ago | 15 years ago |
| Requires PHP | – | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Content Scheduler vs Expire Sticky Posts
- Content Scheduler vs VA Simple Expires
- Content Scheduler vs Appointment Booking Plugin
- Content Scheduler vs Simply Schedule Appointments
- Simple Expires vs WP Post Expires
- Simple Expires vs Auto Post Expire
- Simple Expires vs Expire Sticky Posts
- Simple Expires vs OttoKit
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free