WordPress plugin comparison
Content No Cache vs Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler
Content No Cache
by Jose Mortellaro
200+ installs5.0
Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler
by Pixelmole
Fewer than 10 installs
At a glance
- Content No Cache has more active installs: 200+, against fewer than 10 for Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler.
- On a typical day, Content No Cache is downloaded about 6 times, Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler about 3.
- Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler has no reviews yet.
- Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler was updated more recently: Sep 25, 2026, against Aug 22, 2026 for Content No Cache.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- Content No Cache has been around longer: since 2022, against 2026 for Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler.
Line by line
Content No Cache leads on 4 of 5 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #12,442 | #52,265 |
| Active installs | 200+ | Fewer than 10 |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 154 | 61 |
| Rating | 5.0(18) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | 0% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.46 | ×0.05 |
| Last release | 2 months ago | 1 month ago |
| Requires PHP | 5.6 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Content No Cache vs WP-Optimize
- Content No Cache vs WP Fastest Cache
- Content No Cache vs WP Super Cache
- Content No Cache vs SpeedyCache
- Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler vs Random Content
- Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler vs If-So Conditional Content for Elementor
- Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler vs Dynamic Widget Content
- Pixelmole Campaign Scheduler vs Content Randomizer
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free