WordPress plugin comparison
CitePress vs DiFlowRin Verified References
At a glance
- CitePress has more active installs: 50+, against fewer than 10 for DiFlowRin Verified References.
- On a typical day, DiFlowRin Verified References is downloaded about 62 times, CitePress about 4.
- DiFlowRin Verified References was updated more recently: Nov 3, 2026, against Sep 25, 2026 for CitePress.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- CitePress has been around longer: since 2025, against 2026 for DiFlowRin Verified References.
Line by line
CitePress leads on 3 of 5 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #20,120 | #55,494 |
| Active installs | 50+ | Fewer than 10 |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 73 | 190 |
| Rating | No ratings | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.23 | ×0.05 |
| Last release | 1 month ago | 7 days ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- CitePress vs Academic Blogger's Toolkit
- CitePress vs Citation Importer
- CitePress vs Scholar Sync
- CitePress vs WP Academic Publications
- DiFlowRin Verified References vs Citation Importer
- DiFlowRin Verified References vs WebKew WP References and Citations
- DiFlowRin Verified References vs DiFlowRin Bibliography Checker
- DiFlowRin Verified References vs Reference Manager for WordPress with Footnotes, Citations, Bibliographies, Tooltips and Glossary
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free