WordPress plugin comparison
CCD Traffic Sources vs LocaliQ
At a glance
- LocaliQ has more active installs: 2K+, against 30+ for CCD Traffic Sources.
- On a typical day, LocaliQ is downloaded about 16 times, CCD Traffic Sources about 3.
- CCD Traffic Sources has no reviews yet.
- CCD Traffic Sources was updated more recently: Aug 15, 2026, against Jun 25, 2026 for LocaliQ.
- CCD Traffic Sources is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 6.9.11 for LocaliQ.
- LocaliQ has been around longer: since 2016, against 2026 for CCD Traffic Sources.
Line by line
LocaliQ leads on 4 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  CCD Traffic Sources |  LocaliQ |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #23,441 | #5,015 |
| Active installs | 30+ | 2K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 61 | 410 |
| Rating | No ratings | 3.0(2) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 6.9.11 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.19 | ×0.48 |
| Last release | 2 months ago | 4 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- CCD Traffic Sources vs Attributer
- CCD Traffic Sources vs LeadSource
- CCD Traffic Sources vs Choice Universal Form Tracker for Google Tag Manager
- CCD Traffic Sources vs Pixel Manager for WooCommerce
- LocaliQ vs CallRail Phone Call Tracking
- LocaliQ vs Email Tracker
- LocaliQ vs Nimbata Call Tracking
- LocaliQ vs LeadSource
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free