WordPress plugin comparison
Cache Using Gzip vs NitroPack
At a glance
- NitroPack has more active installs: 80K+, against 400+ for Cache Using Gzip.
- On a typical day, NitroPack is downloaded about 701 times, Cache Using Gzip about 15.
- Cache Using Gzip is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews, against 4.3 from 311 reviews.
- NitroPack was updated more recently: Nov 5, 2026, against Oct 1, 2026 for Cache Using Gzip.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- NitroPack has been around longer: since 2019, against 2024 for Cache Using Gzip.
Line by line
NitroPack leads on 5 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Cache Using Gzip |  NitroPack |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #9,621 | #500 |
| Active installs | 400+ | 80K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 314 | 47.4K |
| Rating | 5.0(3) | 4.3(311) |
| Support threads resolved | – | 0% |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.53 | ×1.04 |
| Last release | 1 month ago | 3 days ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free