WordPress plugin comparison
Beam vs Frontend HTTP Auth Protection
At a glance
- Frontend HTTP Auth Protection has more active installs: 30+, against 10+ for Beam.
- On a typical day, Frontend HTTP Auth Protection is downloaded about 4 times, Beam about 1.
- Frontend HTTP Auth Protection is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 1.0 from 1 review.
- Beam was updated more recently: Dec 3, 2017, against Apr 1, 2016 for Frontend HTTP Auth Protection.
- Beam is tested with a newer WordPress: 4.9.35, against 4.7.39 for Frontend HTTP Auth Protection.
Line by line
Frontend HTTP Auth Protection leads on 4 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Beam |  Frontend HTTP Auth Protection |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #41,953 | #23,016 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 30+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 21 | 71 |
| Rating | 1.0(1) | 5.0(1) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 4.9.35 | 4.7.39 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 9 years ago | 10 years ago |
| Requires PHP | – | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Beam vs WP Cron HTTP Auth
- Beam vs Stream Video Player
- Beam vs WP HTTP Compression
- Beam vs Mavis HTTPS to HTTP Redirection
- Frontend HTTP Auth Protection vs Security Optimizer
- Frontend HTTP Auth Protection vs Limit Login Attempts Security
- Frontend HTTP Auth Protection vs Kadence Security
- Frontend HTTP Auth Protection vs Jetpack Protect
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free