WordPress plugin comparison
Bandwidth Saver vs Clean Image Filenames
At a glance
- Clean Image Filenames has more active installs: 30K+, against fewer than 10 for Bandwidth Saver.
- On a typical day, Clean Image Filenames is downloaded about 233 times, Bandwidth Saver about 2.
- Bandwidth Saver is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 4.6 from 21 reviews.
- Bandwidth Saver was updated more recently: Oct 8, 2026, against Jan 14, 2026 for Clean Image Filenames.
- Bandwidth Saver is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 6.9.11 for Clean Image Filenames.
- Clean Image Filenames has been around longer: since 2014, against 2025 for Bandwidth Saver.
Line by line
Clean Image Filenames leads on 4 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Bandwidth Saver |  Clean Image Filenames |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #67,676 | #975 |
| Active installs | Fewer than 10 | 30K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 75 | 5.4K |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | 4.6(21) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 6.9.11 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.07 | ×0.67 |
| Last release | 1 month ago | 10 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Bandwidth Saver vs NitroPack
- Bandwidth Saver vs Modern Image Formats
- Bandwidth Saver vs TinyPNG Image Optimization
- Bandwidth Saver vs Media Cleaner
- Clean Image Filenames vs Filenames to latin
- Clean Image Filenames vs Custom Upload Dir
- Clean Image Filenames vs Media Cleaner
- Clean Image Filenames vs Media Library Assistant
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free