WordPress plugin comparison
Auto Upload Images vs Bandwidth Saver
At a glance
- Auto Upload Images has more active installs: 20K+, against fewer than 10 for Bandwidth Saver.
- On a typical day, Auto Upload Images is downloaded about 205 times, Bandwidth Saver about 2.
- Bandwidth Saver is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 4.3 from 106 reviews.
- Bandwidth Saver was updated more recently: Oct 8, 2026, against Sep 20, 2026 for Auto Upload Images.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- Auto Upload Images has been around longer: since 2012, against 2025 for Bandwidth Saver.
Line by line
Auto Upload Images leads on 4 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Auto Upload Images |  Bandwidth Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #1,221 | #67,676 |
| Active installs | 20K+ | Fewer than 10 |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 6.1K | 75 |
| Rating | 4.3(106) | 5.0(1) |
| Support threads resolved | 100% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.03 | ×0.07 |
| Last release | 1 month ago | 1 month ago |
| Requires PHP | – | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Auto Upload Images vs Simple Image Sizes
- Auto Upload Images vs Image Watermark
- Auto Upload Images vs Clean Image Filenames
- Auto Upload Images vs No Right Click Images
- Bandwidth Saver vs NitroPack
- Bandwidth Saver vs Modern Image Formats
- Bandwidth Saver vs TinyPNG Image Optimization
- Bandwidth Saver vs Media Cleaner
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free