WordPress plugin comparison
Aruba HiSpeed Cache vs NitroPack
At a glance
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has more active installs: 100K+, against 80K+ for NitroPack.
- On a typical day, Aruba HiSpeed Cache is downloaded about 1,128 times, NitroPack about 701.
- NitroPack is rated higher: 4.3 out of 5 from 311 reviews, against 3.0 from 10 reviews.
- NitroPack was updated more recently: Nov 5, 2026, against Oct 26, 2026 for Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache resolves more of its support threads: 100% in the last two months, against 0% for NitroPack.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- NitroPack has been around longer: since 2019, against 2022 for Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
Line by line
Aruba HiSpeed Cache leads on 4 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Aruba HiSpeed Cache |  NitroPack |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #322 | #500 |
| Active installs | 100K+ | 80K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 44.4K | 46.9K |
| Rating | 3.0(10) | 4.3(311) |
| Support threads resolved | 100% | 0% |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.05 | ×1.04 |
| Last release | 14 days ago | 4 days ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free