WordPress plugin comparison
Aruba HiSpeed Cache vs neo Optimize
Aruba HiSpeed Cache
by Aruba.it Dev
100K+ installs3.0
neo Optimize
by neoWP Media Image Plugins
30+ installs5.0
At a glance
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has more active installs: 100K+, against 30+ for neo Optimize.
- On a typical day, Aruba HiSpeed Cache is downloaded about 1,081 times, neo Optimize about 10.
- neo Optimize is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 1 review, against 3.0 from 10 reviews.
- neo Optimize was updated more recently: Nov 2, 2026, against Oct 26, 2026 for Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache resolves more of its support threads: 100% in the last two months, against 0% for neo Optimize.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has been around longer: since 2022, against 2026 for neo Optimize.
Line by line
Aruba HiSpeed Cache leads on 5 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric | Aruba HiSpeed Cache | neo Optimize |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #322 | #24,161 |
| Active installs | 100K+ | 30+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 45.4K | 281 |
| Rating | 3.0(10) | 5.0(1) |
| Support threads resolved | 100% | 0% |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.05 | ×0.27 |
| Last release | 15 days ago | 7 days ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 8.0 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free