WordPress plugin comparison
Aruba HiSpeed Cache vs Cache Using Gzip
At a glance
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has more active installs: 100K+, against 400+ for Cache Using Gzip.
- On a typical day, Aruba HiSpeed Cache is downloaded about 1,128 times, Cache Using Gzip about 15.
- Cache Using Gzip is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews, against 3.0 from 10 reviews.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache was updated more recently: Oct 26, 2026, against Oct 1, 2026 for Cache Using Gzip.
- Both are tested up to WordPress 7.1.4.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has been around longer: since 2022, against 2024 for Cache Using Gzip.
Line by line
Aruba HiSpeed Cache leads on 5 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Aruba HiSpeed Cache |  Cache Using Gzip |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #322 | #9,621 |
| Active installs | 100K+ | 400+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 44.6K | 314 |
| Rating | 3.0(10) | 5.0(3) |
| Support threads resolved | 100% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.05 | ×0.53 |
| Last release | 14 days ago | 1 month ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free