WordPress plugin comparison
Aruba HiSpeed Cache vs Cache by Folium
At a glance
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache has more active installs: 100K+, against 100+ for Cache by Folium.
- On a typical day, Aruba HiSpeed Cache is downloaded about 1,128 times, Cache by Folium about 6.
- Cache by Folium is rated higher: 4.2 out of 5 from 10 reviews, against 3.0 from 10 reviews.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache was updated more recently: Oct 26, 2026, against Jun 13, 2026 for Cache by Folium.
- Aruba HiSpeed Cache is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 7.0.8 for Cache by Folium.
- Cache by Folium has been around longer: since 2017, against 2022 for Aruba HiSpeed Cache.
Line by line
Aruba HiSpeed Cache leads on 6 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Aruba HiSpeed Cache |  Cache by Folium |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #322 | #13,520 |
| Active installs | 100K+ | 100+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 44.6K | 124 |
| Rating | 3.0(10) | 4.2(10) |
| Support threads resolved | 100% | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 7.0.8 |
| Search multiplier | ×1.05 | ×0.36 |
| Last release | 14 days ago | 4 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free