WordPress plugin comparison
AI Content Signals vs Robots.txt Editor
At a glance
- Robots.txt Editor has more active installs: 10K+, against 800+ for AI Content Signals.
- On a typical day, Robots.txt Editor is downloaded about 134 times, AI Content Signals about 30.
- AI Content Signals is rated higher: 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews, against 4.5 from 8 reviews.
- AI Content Signals was updated more recently: Aug 28, 2026, against Jan 16, 2021 for Robots.txt Editor.
- AI Content Signals is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.1.4, against 5.6.23 for Robots.txt Editor.
- Robots.txt Editor has been around longer: since 2019, against 2025 for AI Content Signals.
Line by line
AI Content Signals leads on 4 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric |  AI Content Signals |  Robots.txt Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #7,355 | #1,915 |
| Active installs | 800+ | 10K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 693 | 3.5K |
| Rating | 5.0(3) | 4.5(8) |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 7.1.4 | 5.6.23 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.61 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 2 months ago | 5 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 5.6 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- AI Content Signals vs Website LLMs.txt
- AI Content Signals vs WP Robots Txt
- AI Content Signals vs Soro
- AI Content Signals vs ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO
- Robots.txt Editor vs WP Robots Txt
- Robots.txt Editor vs Virtual Robots.txt
- Robots.txt Editor vs Website LLMs.txt
- Robots.txt Editor vs Title and Nofollow For Links (Classic Editor)
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free