WordPress plugin comparison
Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> vs Capo
At a glance
- Capo has more active installs: 20+, against 10+ for Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head>.
- On a typical day, Capo is downloaded about 2 times, Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> about 1.
- Capo was updated more recently: Aug 24, 2026, against Jun 30, 2018 for Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head>.
- Capo is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.0.8, against 4.9.35 for Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head>.
- Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> has been around longer: since 2018, against 2026 for Capo.
Line by line
Capo leads on 6 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> |  Capo |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #47,639 | #25,727 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 20+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 30 | 80 |
| Rating | No ratings | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 4.9.35 | 7.0.8 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.17 |
| Last release | 8 years ago | 2 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 5.2.4 | 7.4 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> vs Header and Footer Scripts
- Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> vs Head & Footer Code
- Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> vs Advance Custom HTML
- Add HTML, JavaScript and CSS to <head> vs HiFi (Head Injection, Foot Injection)
- Capo vs Jetpack Boost
- Capo vs Speed Optimizer
- Capo vs 10Web Booster
- Capo vs Debloat
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free