WordPress plugin comparison
ACF Timber Integration vs WPicnik
At a glance
- ACF Timber Integration has more active installs: 200+, against 10+ for WPicnik.
- On a typical day, ACF Timber Integration is downloaded about 4 times, WPicnik about 1.
- WPicnik has no reviews yet.
- ACF Timber Integration was updated more recently: Feb 10, 2021, against Apr 6, 2008 for WPicnik.
- ACF Timber Integration is tested with a newer WordPress: 5.6.23, against 2.5 for WPicnik.
- WPicnik has been around longer: since 2008, against 2017 for ACF Timber Integration.
Line by line
ACF Timber Integration leads on 6 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  ACF Timber Integration |  WPicnik |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #11,625 | #41,921 |
| Active installs | 200+ | 10+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 52 | 23 |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 5.6.23 | 2.5 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 5 years ago | 18 years ago |
| Requires PHP | – | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- ACF Timber Integration vs ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO
- ACF Timber Integration vs Advanced Custom Fields
- ACF Timber Integration vs Table Field Add-on for ACF and SCF
- ACF Timber Integration vs Advanced Custom Fields
- WPicnik vs WP Fusion Lite
- WPicnik vs mosparo Integration
- WPicnik vs Cool Integration for LearnPress & WooCommerce
- WPicnik vs Integrate Ecomail and Elementor Forms
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free