WordPress plugin comparison
ACF Permalinks vs Permalink Encoding
At a glance
- ACF Permalinks has more active installs: 300+, against 10+ for Permalink Encoding.
- On a typical day, ACF Permalinks is downloaded about 7 times, Permalink Encoding about 1.
- Permalink Encoding has no reviews yet.
- ACF Permalinks was updated more recently: Oct 24, 2018, against Nov 6, 2011 for Permalink Encoding.
- ACF Permalinks is tested with a newer WordPress: 5.0.31, against 3.2.1 for Permalink Encoding.
- Permalink Encoding has been around longer: since 2011, against 2018 for ACF Permalinks.
Line by line
ACF Permalinks leads on 6 of 6 comparable lines.
| Metric |  ACF Permalinks |  Permalink Encoding |
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #11,042 | #29,268 |
| Active installs | 300+ | 10+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 100 | 29 |
| Rating | 5.0(1) | No ratings |
| Support threads resolved | – | – |
| Tested up to | 5.0.31 | 3.2.1 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.00 | ×0.00 |
| Last release | 8 years ago | 15 years ago |
| Requires PHP | 5.3 | – |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- ACF Permalinks vs Advanced Custom Fields
- ACF Permalinks vs Ajax Load More for Advanced Custom Fields
- ACF Permalinks vs Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
- ACF Permalinks vs Advanced Custom Fields
- Permalink Encoding vs Custom Permalink Editor
- Permalink Encoding vs Automatically Update Permalinks
- Permalink Encoding vs Custom Fields Permalink 2
- Permalink Encoding vs Advanced Permalinks
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free