WordPress plugin comparison
Blocks for ACF Fields vs Content Views
At a glance
- Content Views has more active installs: 100K+, against 2K+ for Blocks for ACF Fields.
- On a typical day, Content Views is downloaded about 560 times, Blocks for ACF Fields about 67.
- Blocks for ACF Fields is rated higher: 4.9 out of 5 from 13 reviews, against 4.8 from 333 reviews.
- Blocks for ACF Fields was updated more recently: Nov 7, 2026, against Aug 31, 2026 for Content Views.
- Blocks for ACF Fields is tested with a newer WordPress: 7.2, against 7.1.4 for Content Views.
- Content Views has been around longer: since 2014, against 2024 for Blocks for ACF Fields.
Line by line
Content Views leads on 4 of 7 comparable lines.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Popular rank | #4,631 | #365 |
| Active installs | 2K+ | 100K+ |
| Downloads, last 30 days | 3.2K | 19.4K |
| Rating | 4.9(13) | 4.8(333) |
| Support threads resolved | 0% | 0% |
| Tested up to | 7.2 | 7.1.4 |
| Search multiplier | ×0.70 | ×1.13 |
| Last release | 3 days ago | 2 months ago |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 5.6 |
From WordPress.org's public data, refreshed every night. Downloads are WordPress.org's official daily figures for the last 30 days.
Tags they share
More comparisons
- Blocks for ACF Fields vs Meta Field Block
- Blocks for ACF Fields vs Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
- Blocks for ACF Fields vs Spectra Legacy
- Blocks for ACF Fields vs Layout Grid Block
- Content Views vs Post Grid
- Content Views vs AnWP Post Grid and Post Carousel Slider for Elementor
- Content Views vs Ultimate Addons for Elementor
- Content Views vs Spectra Legacy
Is one of these yours?
Track your plugin against its rivals every day: rank, installs, downloads, ratings and their releases, with alerts when anything moves.
Start free